Lkdc (@Lkdc@dmv.community) (DMV.Community)
@kolev@babka.social @laxla@tech.lgbt I'm very secular, so I usually say the actual word. However, if I'm talking to someone who is observant, I try to be respectful of their feelings and not say the word. In writing, that is easy. When speaking out loud, I'm never sure how to indicate the word without actually saying it, so I usually avoid it altogether and say something like "those people outside the train station with the racks of religious booklets". How do you deal with the name of that group? Do you say "J's Witnesses"? If so, do people understand what you mean?

@Lkdc@dmv.community People understand when I say “J’s Witnesses” and I know rabbis who use the term. @laxla@tech.lgbt

Lkdc (@Lkdc@dmv.community) (DMV.Community)
@laxla@tech.lgbt @kolev@babka.social I wasn't being sarcastic. I was genuinely shocked at the idea of Christian missionaries going to a country that is majority Jewish and trying to convert people. That isn't what I'm used to here. The only missionaries that I encounter here are Mormons and J------'s Witnesses (members of two minority Christian sects). I don't know what they do in other places, but in my city they mostly approach other Christians and try to get those Christians to switch from their current churches to the missionaries' church. They are very annoying, but what they do is much less offensive than approaching Jews and telling Jews to become Christians. I was shocked to learn that there are people doing that, and am surprised that the Israeli government gives visas to missionaries to enter the country.

@Lkdc@dmv.community Unrelated: Do you say “J’s Witnesses” instead of “J-e-h-o-v-a-h’s Witnesses?” since it represents a Shem? @laxla@tech.lgbt

Replying to #Mastodon threads on the #WordPress #IndieWeb is tricky. I set the post type as a Reply, but it still doesn’t show up in the thread…

Lkdc (@Lkdc@dmv.community) (DMV.Community)
@kolev@babka.social What I've heard from progressive, educated Christians is that Pharisees AS A GROUP weren't bad people. Only the specific INDIVIDUAL Pharisees who butted heads with Jesus behaved badly. Unfortunately, the writers of the New Testament were sloppy, and they often just wrote "a Pharisee" instead of using the individual's name. I believe that this is a major factor in the rampant antisemitism in some churches, especially the so-called "Bible churches". It would have been so much better if Jesus's enemies had been identified as named individuals. As a comparison, it would be okay for someone today to say "Pierre Poilievre and Bonnie Henry are bad people", but it would be sloppy and harmful to say "Canadians are bad people". Using actual names makes it clear that the individuals, not the entire group, are at fault. I'm really lucky in that I live in a neighborhood where most of the churches are progressive, and there are good relationships between Jews and Christians. How are things where you live?

In my area, most Christians are respectful, but some non-denominational Christians have their eyes buried so deep in their Bibles that they can’t see the people in front of them. And what’s worse is that these types don’t subscribe to any outside authority; they depend only on their own interpretation of scripture, so positing popular arguments like the ones in Nostra Aetate fall on deaf ears. So much for “Do not rely only on your own limited understanding!”

If #Jewish people are modern-day Pharisees, and #Christian people look unfavorably upon Pharisees, then what does that mean for #antisemitism?

#religion #Judaism #Christianity